STATE of CORRUPTION III: Media Collusion? These guys would LIE about what our favorite COLOR is
UPDATED: Example: KSTP-TV distorted stadium poll findings.
Did Twin Cities journalism outlets take a dive during the debate over the $1B Vikings stadium proposal? Help crowd-source my effort to remember the worst moments, most-naked conflicts of interest and most-egregious omissions. Maybe there were even noteworthy exceptions when mainstream media outlets distinguished themselves. I don’t remember any, but surprise me.
Would these make your list of low lights?
Channel 4′s Mark Rosen editorializing on air, just before the Stadium Vote?
KFAN Radio using the airwaves to browbeat and abuse stadium opponents?
The Strib’s failure to do any opinion polling on the issue after the actual proposal was made public?
The straight-faced reporting by almost all media of an advocacy “push-poll” effort to manufacture grassroots support?
The near-complete absence of critical columns and comments during six months of maneuvering?
The bogus reports of Zygi’s plane being spotted in Los Angeles?
The failure by reporters to bust down the closed doors and prevent the secret-meetings that cooked up the deal?
Or how about this: The Strib’s Patrick Reusse critically examining stadium financials to show that the Vikings will pay virtually nothing out of their own coffers for their new stadium — only AFTER the deal was done???
Here’s a little nugget to chew on to get you started, courtesy of Channel 5:
RED OR BLUE? What’s your favorite color? Too bad. We Only Care What Zygi’s Favorite Color Is
What is Minnesota’s Favorite Color?
Read the following numbers and tell me, if these were the results from a survey of Minnesotans, what is our favorite color?
Careful: You have to act as if the poll came from a lame-stream for-profit media outlet trying to keep its Minnesota Vikings-related revenue stream intact. Got it? OK, here are the numbers:
16 % — BLUE
36 % — Usually BLUE
42% — RED
OK, what’s our favorite color? BLUE, right? 16 percent say blue outright, another 36 percent say usually blue. That adds up to 52 percent — so a bit MORE THAN HALF of Minnesotans say blue is their favorite color. You are very naive. Wake up, sucker.
KSTP-TV would tell you Minnesotans say RED is their favorite color. That’s how they interpreted the exact same percentages last week, in a “poll” in which Channel 5 said a plurality of Minnesota favor building a new stadium. Imagine how fast that news went around the Capitol. Virtually no polling was done on the stadium issue since last Fall, when clear majorities of the public opposed a new stadium, and before the details of the eventual boondoggle were released. Into this polling vacuum came a pretend poll done by a pro-stadium advocacy group that used what is known as a push-poll technique. Here’s an example: “Would You Approve or Disapprove of a new Vikings Stadium…if opposing a new stadium meant your grandmother would die.”
Uh, OK, I guess I’m in favor of a new stadium. I love Granny’s ginger snaps.
This fake poll was widely reported.
The only other poll I am aware of at present was last week’s KSTP poll — a real poll, perhaps, but one in which the results were poorly reported — poorly enough to be labeled a serious distortion of the findings.
Here are the questions Channel 5 asked:
“Should the Minnesota Vikings keep playing football in the Metrodome without renovating it?
Should they renovate the stadium and keep playing in it?
Or should a new stadium be built?”
And here are the answers they got:
16% Keep Playing, Don’t Renovate
36% Renovate the Metrodome
43% Build a New Stadium
OK, pretty clear: Headline should say: A Majority of Minnesotans oppose new stadium; Prefer Metrodome
That headline would have been consistent with past findings, and would accurately have reflected these findings. Instead, Channel 5 reported the results this way:
“Though Minnesotans remain divided on what to do about the Minnesota Vikings, a plurality now for the first time supports building a new stadium (emphasis mine), according to a SurveyUSA poll conducted exclusively for KSTP-TV Minneapolis / St. Paul.
A plurality supports a stadium?! For the first time!
Really? No, a MAJORITY opposes one. How did this happen? This is either deliberate distortion or serious incompetence.
The true finding — a majority in opposition — was bolstered by other findings in the poll: 58 percent of respondents said they believed that only private funding should be used for a new stadium; and 67 percent said the public should get to vote on the stadium plan. These, in themselves, were significant findings that might have affected the “debate,” if they had been properly reported. Instead, the impact of the poll on tired, sequestered legislators meeting in closed-door rooms under intense pressure from the Governor and the Vikings is easy to imagine:
A Plurality Supports the Stadium! Quick! Let’s pass it, Oscar, and get the hell out of Dodge!
(Click here for a link to the Channel 5 poll story)
Are the Twin Cities media that stupid, lazy, incompetent? Or just plain deceitful?
You tell me.
This is just one part of the story I am working on about the collapse of Minnesota Media and its inability to cover the Vikings stadium story with any journalistic integrity. It could be a book.
Maybe you agree with me that the media aided and abetted the worst Legislative/political sell-out in 40 years. Maybe you don’t. But if you do, please add to this discussion by commenting here on the stadium and the media. I believe this is a textbook case of media failure. And I would like to get the conversation going.
Please return here in the next day or so to see what we can come up with.
Thanks,
Nick Coleman
Previous posts in “STATE of CORRUPTION:”
How the Stadium Deal Went Down, and Took Open Government With It
–30–

Local media didn’t factcheck the sighting of Wilf’s private plane in S. California. Original source (LA Daily News?) didn’t say who saw it.
Do you have a link to Reusse’s critical analysis? I can’t seem to locate it.
Dan: Here it is: http://www.1500espn.com/sportswire/Reusse_Quite_a_bonanza_for_our_stadium_martyr_Zygi051112
It was on his radio site. Also, notice in the lede that be admits to what another journalist calls. “Journalistic malpractice” by acknowledging that he and other sports writers supported/pushed for a stadium because it helped them on their jobs.
Yes, yes, these were all really bad, Nick. But nothing less to be expected from the local corporate media.
The one that absolutely took my breath away though was Lori Sturdevant’s Strib column calling for more political solutions/outcomes like the stadium conference committee that did everything it could to avoid the state’s open-meeting laws.
Like that’s really a good thing.
I would nominate the people of Minnesota who continue to buy the Star Tribune despite all evidence that the Strib is not a news-gathering organization, but rather an opinion vendor of low repute.
I don’t fault the liars and dirtbags. I fault the people who fund them through subscriptions and news stand sales.
Nick, beyond what you’ve mentioned, there were two things I felt the local media completely ignored:
1. An analysis of the Los Angeles stadium situation, and a realistic examination of the viability of the Vikings moving to L.A. or any other city.
2. A look at cities such as Detroit and Indianapolis, who had built publicly subsidized stadiums, to evaluate whether these stadiums had brought about the financial benefits that supporters claimed.
Without this information, there was really no context for the public to determine whether the two key arguments for the stadium – that the Vikings would move to L.A. and that the stadium would be great for the economy – were valid.
Three more: Strib ran a story about Vikings players doing volunteer work in feature published last week or two before votes. Sturdevant’s last column immediately pre-vote sympathetically profiled authors over leading opponents. WCCO-TV’s Sunday morning show two or three weeks in a row had only Vikings officials and pro stadium public officials as guests.
I would agree with Mark on funding the Strib. I do not buy, subscribe or even bother with it online.
It was ugly. It was ugly when the Metrodome was foisted upon us as well. The argument then was the need for a domed environment. Now the argument was for baseball and football to be outdoors. Hypocrisy all around.
The heart of the matter was Wilf holding the state hostage. Doug Grow had an article in MinnPost about how moving was not all that great of a deal for Ziggy. Most appalling to me is the collapse of any sort of bargaining by our officials representing the state.
I am a Minneapolis Union Pipefitter and appreciate the jobs that this will bring and that the Vikings are staying, but both of those would have remained, without giving it all away so easily.
One could say that it was a twofer for the Strib to change so much recently, they have that property where the stadium is going to be built and they created a propaganda organ. Ugly, ugly ugly.
It may be somewhat trivial, but I was appalled by this line in the gag-inducing post-passage Strib editorial (entitled “Strong leadership led to stadium deal”): “ONCE the Minneapolis City Council signs off on its contribution, we hope city leaders, state officials and the Vikings will continue to work together to ensure that the new home of the Vikings becomes the first-class ‘People’s Stadium’ that Dayton has envisioned.” (Emphasis added.)
Not “if” or even “assuming” but “once.” It’s bad enough that some City leaders are conspiring with the State to deprive city residents of a referendum. Can the Strib acknowledge that City Council approval is, at least in theory, not a foregone conclusion?
On the other side of the spectrum, kudos to the City Pages for its excellent cover story exposing 10 myths about the stadium debate.
//Local media didn’t factcheck the sighting of Wilf’s private plane in S. California. Original source (LA Daily News?) didn’t say who saw it.
Actually, this is wrong. The original reporting hinted strongly that the plane was in LA — without actually saying it. I was the one who found out it was in San Diego — which, for the record, is NOT Los Angeles. And I did it by having some friends of mine who run a business on the airport grounds go take a look.
Cool. So you reported that it was NOT in LA? Correct? But it was reported, and echoed here somewhere, that it WAS in LA? Ne c’est pas?
Glad to be set straight on that. Props to you, Bob Collins. Kind of funny that your fact checking led to some clarifications that it was southern California, not LA–but still no attribution for who if anyone spotted the plane.
Sunday’s Strib headline was something to the effect of “Now the Fun Begins.” I believe the WIlf’s and the Strib and KFAN have been having fun all along. This whole thing has been beautifully orchestrated, and was rammed through the legislature even though there was bipartisan opposition to be had if anyone had the will to resist.
Also, the naked conflicts of interest of the Star Tribune from both the real estate angle and the Sports section staff and KFAN’s on air personalities as well is mind boggling. The Strib’s relentless flogging of this issue is the most wildly unprofessional and irresponsible journalism since the Pioneer Press endorsed the reelection of George W. Bush and then four years later withheld an endorsement of Barack Obama.
THe other elephant in the room is what to do with that stadium and its related debt if (and maybe it’s when) the Mother of All Class Action Lawsuits is litigated against the NFL for compensation for brain damage by every player for the past however many decades, and either puts the league out of business right away or results in a game that fans won’t watch.
Yes, that’s correct. As I wrote at the time, this was right out of the NFL playbook for getting a stadium. Several owners have parked their planes in various locations and then slipped a note to the media. This particular plane story was an absolute crock right from the start. And the local media bit on it. Hard.
The governor got it right when he said today that the benefits of a new stadium for a losing franchise that plays 51 hours per year are uncertain and “the costs are very real.”
The stadium funding is built on lies, bombast and extortion and will be paid for by crushing taxes in Minneapolis more of the most regressive tax on stupidity: electronic pulltabs and bingo.
Few Minnesotans know (because our media did not tell us) that we are ALSO PAYING for the stadium by slashing funds for renovating the Cass Gilbert designed state capitol, AND by not building the SW Light Rail, AND by not having a Saints Stadium, AND by not renovating Civic Centers in Mankato, Rochester and St. Cloud AND by shelving Chatfield Center for the Arts, Stewartville Fire Hall renovation, National Trout Center in Preston, or Red Wing’s Sheldon Theatre renovation.
Seems like they can tell the truth now — now that it’s a done deal.
Let me first say I don’t live in Minnesota. But I follow sports, and I followed this “debate” avidly — as I believe that public subsidies for professional sports (and college sports, for that matter — another deeply corrupt world) has gotten seriously out of hand. In watching from afar, I have been appalled, shocked and amazed at the dearth of real journalism, or true reporting on this by the Minneapolis media. I would visit the websites and was truly stunned by the level of cheerleading and boosterism displayed, especially at the Trib. Where was the reporting on the many studies that show these public subsidies for sports entities don’t pay off? Where was the reporting on the areas that have refused to pay for these sports boondoggles (like Massachusetts) — and how well that turned out for everyone, including the team owners? I have never seen such blatant fear-mongering (the Vikes will leave!!! We have to do something!!) and distortions on the part of the local press. It was, frankly, pretty pathetic and I was embarrassed for Minnesotans to see how everyone fell on their knees to genuflect when the NFL came to town, and the blatant manipulation of the BS about the Wilf jet sighted in LA (see! see! they are going to leave!!). There was NO way the Vikings were going to LA. Moving the Vikings to LA, one of the most iconic NFL brands, would have been a PR debacle. You are doing a real service, Nick, even if you are howling in the wind. Yours is the only truly skeptical reporting I have observed. It’s a sad day for Minnesota. Think of what that money could have been spent on. Keeping tuition down at the U? Funding infrastructure improvements? Improving public safety? Very, very sad waste of taxpayer funds, and something future generations will pay for. You only have to look at St. Louis, where they have to spend much more than they bargained for, and are wondering how to afford it — and even Indy, which is now post Peyton Manning foggy thinking, and are wondering what they are paying for without their fearless leader. It’s a proven bad deal to pay for this type of sports monstrosity — but the NFL has preyed on the insecurities of Minnesotans and other areas (we won’t be “world class” without a football team) and has used lies and manipulation to transfer multiple hundreds of millions in public money to a private entities. Disgusting. Thanks for doing what you do.
Lulu: I DO feel as if I am howling into the wind. Or maybe it’s just that I am howling into the spin. But I believe that what just happened in Minnesota needs to be dissected, discussed and debated until we have a full understanding of who controlled a process that was hidden from public view and manipulated by the most powerful corporate influences in the state while the supposed “progressive” and liberal forces that supported Mark Dayton stayed silent. I appreciate your concern and your attention. There’s been far too little of both in Minnesota.
Keep howling! Your voice is the only refreshing sound coming from journalism these days. It is shocking that bailing out a billionaire with public funds would be so easy. But it takes a lot of energy to fight a billionaire, whether Wilfs or corporate media owners (all of whom make more money thanks to this welfare deal). J-school ethics thrown out when your livelihood, tied up with presumed status is threatened.
Thanks, Janie! You and I both know how journalism is supposed to work. And we recognize when it doesn’t.
This crowd sourcing is very important, as it is so true that stadium “news” was propaganda.
The context and facts were ignored and / or hidden. For example—unions were bullying electeds for jobs. How many jobs and for how long? How would those numbers compare with the investments that didn’t get funded?
And yes, the Mpls. City Council still has to approve the $ in violation of their city charter if they are to meet the deadline. I keep thinking that a massive sit in at the City Council meetings would be appropriate. How about “Occupy Mpls. City Hall—the People’s Hall?” There is no way that bypassing the city charter is not a violation of the charter.
Seems like this could be a facet of the Occupy Movement, as it is a billionaire’s heist of public funding.
I’ve been wondering for months why the OccupyMN movement hasn’t targeted the stadium issue. It’s the perfect illustration of what is wrong with this country — and what is wrong with both political parties, including the Democrats.
As Lulu touched on in her post. I would have expected at least one of the two TC papersto have done an article reviewing how the most recently built stadiums had been financed including Dallas,San Fransisco and NY.
I would have liked a reporter to approach some of the “progressive” advocacy groups for comment while the bill was makings it way through committee hearings: Take Action Minnesota, Alliance for a Better Minnesota and Isaiah. All groups supported heavily by labor unions. Did these groups allow their mission to be compromised and their voices to be silenced.
Why were the “progressives” silent? Good question.I think it’s because they have a guy in the governor’s office who smiles at them and returns their phone calls. Too many progressives roll over when someone scratches their bellies. If Tim Pawlenty had been the governor pushing the stadium boondoggle, the progressives would have mobilized against it. Just take a look at this post on the “Minnesota Progressive Project” web site: http://www.mnprogressiveproject.com/diary/11495/new-poll-shows-vikings-stadium-vote-doesnt-matter-to-voters
Basically, the poll that is being discussed showed that majorities of Minnesota voters 1) Opposed a new stadium 2) Opposed public taxes for a stadium and 3) Wanted to be able to vote on any new stadium. All progressive values, if you ask me. But what does the post argue: That Mark Dayton and Democrats could push for a bailout for a billionaire and not suffer consequences at the next election. A total betrayal of “progressive” ideals.
it is more simple than that. Follow the money. These groups draw their funding and support from the labor unions. To keep peace in the House of Labor and provide jobs for the building and construction members other unions could not oppose the stadium.
To what degree will the jobs created after the stadium is built be living wage jobs with a benefits package? Very little discussion considering it will be the Peoples Stadium.
Nothing new here. Minnesota is the “Gopher State.” In 1857 an attempt was made to amend the constitution to allow the state to issue $5,000,000 bonds to aid building railroads. Opponents published a satirical political cartoon showing men with heads pulled down bags of gold hung on their necks. They represented bribed legislators aka “Primary Directors.” On their backs was a railroad track with a train drawn by nine gophers shouting “We have no cash, but will give you our drafts.” The train’s passengers were advocates of the bonding bill with a flag saying “Gopher train; excursion train; members of extra session of legislature, free. We develop the resources of the country.” The bill passed and the state was saddled with a $5,000,000 debt which bled it dry for two decades. This cartoon was why we are the gopher state. http://www.mnterritorialpioneers.org/images/info/cartoon-hrez.jpg
There are different ways one can read a poll. For example:
16% Keep Playing, Don’t Renovate
36% Renovate the Metrodome
43% Build a New Stadium
That would equate to 79 percent of respondents being opposed to the status quo of the team continuing to play in the Dome as-is.
Sorry. In Public Opinion Research World, the choices are Stay Put or Move. Stay Put won a majority — backed up by heavy majorities who a) wanted a public vote and b) didn’t want public taxes used. The findings were distorted and the only question is: Deliberate distortion? Or just plain stupidity?
Where were the so-called progressives in Minneapolis in this debate? Where IS OccupyMN, such as it was? Why was there no storming of the legislature to protest this gigantic give-away of public funds?? Why was it only people in purple face point and Vikings helmets roaming the halls? Is it some sort of collective inferiority complex on the part of Minnesotans, both progressives and conservatives, who really do fear that somehow they will be diminished if a football team leaves? Or was it the deliberate mis-information campaign that is being outlined in this thread — with the local media (again, such as it is) complicit and in on the con? Or maybe a combination?
All I can say is that when next there is a complaint that the state is not funding some need or other (education, public transportation, etc. etc.) — progressives will have to take some of the blame. Because for the most part, they looked the other way and maybe even tacitly support this — when an out of state billionaire took them for a ride, with the help of their local representatives.
And Gov. Dayton. Sheesh. How can a self respecting DFL-er continue to support him, after this disgusting display?
Again, easy for me say. I’m not a Minnesotan, and so really don’t have a lot of right to weigh in. But I’ve always heard there are genuine progressives in Minnesota, so wonder why there was no real organized opposition to this.
You make excellent points. The “progressives” are not really progressive. They are stalking horses who are just happy to be close to the seat of power. Did I say “stalking horses?” No, That’s not it. “Lap dogs” is closer to the truth. As for OccupyMN, those folks seem too pleased with their bravery to notice the biggest billionaire giveaway that was going on in front of their faces.
As noted above, it’s all about the construction trade unions. They wanted jobs for their members, same as with the Boondoggle Bridge. And as corporate money in this post-Citizens-United world flows even more strongly to the GOP — just look next door in Wisconsin; Walker’s got over $25 million to Barrett’s less than $1 million for the recall election — the unions, as weakened as they are, take on more importance. (Especially as the Dems, particularly the “third way” ones, have screwed them in the past few decades.)
Don’t just beat up the “progs” like Cam Gordon and John Marty when the unions are the big drivers for this (and for the Boondoggle Bridge) on the Dem side.
this was a powerful combination of self-interests and for the first time in a long time, closed mindsets catching a glimpse of the torch-carrying crowd on election day.
such a heady brew cannot be served in bright light, or it goes skunky.
in the old days, when Sid and the Big Cigars (great name for a band, eh?) ran the town’s sports businesses, all the arm twisting was done in the dark. this time, you saw some of it. which makes the rest all the more antagonizing.
back then, it was a free chuckle. “lot of city business got done in XXXX bar.” in the back rooms. with the big guys entering through the kitchen.
same old, different day.